<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Nally Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenallynotes.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenallynotes.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:10:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To SLR or not to SLR? by Kimberly Kwan</title>
		<link>http://www.thenallynotes.com/?p=8&#038;cpage=1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Kwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifedecanted.com/thenallynotes/?p=8#comment-4</guid>
		<description>quite frankly, once you get used to the RAW workflow, it will SIMPLIFY your life.  As long as you shoo reasonable well-exposed images and know how to use Custom White Balance, you are 80% of the way there.  AND...if you bite the bullet and buy Lightroom, your workflow processes will be made SO MUCH more user-friendly!
I went RAW about 2 years ago and have never looked back!   The Nikon D40 should make your 1st time oh-so-pleasurable!  ;P
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quite frankly, once you get used to the RAW workflow, it will SIMPLIFY your life.  As long as you shoo reasonable well-exposed images and know how to use Custom White Balance, you are 80% of the way there.  AND&#8230;if you bite the bullet and buy Lightroom, your workflow processes will be made SO MUCH more user-friendly!<br />
I went RAW about 2 years ago and have never looked back!   The Nikon D40 should make your 1st time oh-so-pleasurable!  ;P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To SLR or not to SLR? by anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thenallynotes.com/?p=8&#038;cpage=1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifedecanted.com/thenallynotes/?p=8#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Oh, and one more thing -- the 6MP D40 is a huge leap up from any point-and-shoot 5-8MP camera.  Don&#039;t be boggled by the pixel count.  A better measure is the size of the sensor.  The D40 image sensor is probably 3 times the size of your Canon A610 ... the D40 will gather more light and provide truer colors and contrast.  Even Nikon&#039;s top of the line D3 drops down in pixel count in certain modes, because the pros know that you don&#039;t need a bazillion megapixels to take a great photo.
Get the D40.  In a few years, the 12MP camera bodies will be under $500, and you can upgrade.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and one more thing &#8212; the 6MP D40 is a huge leap up from any point-and-shoot 5-8MP camera.  Don&#8217;t be boggled by the pixel count.  A better measure is the size of the sensor.  The D40 image sensor is probably 3 times the size of your Canon A610 &#8230; the D40 will gather more light and provide truer colors and contrast.  Even Nikon&#8217;s top of the line D3 drops down in pixel count in certain modes, because the pros know that you don&#8217;t need a bazillion megapixels to take a great photo.<br />
Get the D40.  In a few years, the 12MP camera bodies will be under $500, and you can upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To SLR or not to SLR? by anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thenallynotes.com/?p=8&#038;cpage=1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifedecanted.com/thenallynotes/?p=8#comment-2</guid>
		<description>No, no, no ... don&#039;t wait.  Seriously, you will kick yourself for having waited this long to get a DSLR.  I am a Nikon guy, but I&#039;d have no problem recommending a Canon to someone if they wanted to go that route.
Since you are already an SLR person, you already know the benefits, but you just need a push.  Do it.  Yes, they will just get cheaper and more capable, and then you will just find another reason to wait.
Just one shot will have made it worth your while.  A shot of your daughter in low-light, where you were able to get a fast shutter because the camera automatically boosted the ISO to 800 to give you a 1/60s release ... or an arty, large aperture/shallow depth of field shot that you&#039;ll take in your garden ... there just isn&#039;t any comparison.
I started with a D70 4 years ago, and just got a D300.  I can&#039;t bear to put it down.
The processing can be a bear, I admit, but it is better than sending the film off to get printed, or the mess and bother of your own darkroom, right?
Buy the camera, get a decent zoom lens (18-70, or even 18-55) and maybe get a good 50mm prime.  In a few months buy an flash unit.  You won&#039;t be sorry.  The great thing about DSLRs is that the bodies get cheaper but lenses continue to be useful with a new body.  So, in 3 years, you can buy a D500 and still use all your lenses and most of your accessories.  By then you&#039;ll have an 8-year old that you won&#039;t mind loaning your D40 to, justifying your D500 purchase.   ;^]
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no, no &#8230; don&#8217;t wait.  Seriously, you will kick yourself for having waited this long to get a DSLR.  I am a Nikon guy, but I&#8217;d have no problem recommending a Canon to someone if they wanted to go that route.<br />
Since you are already an SLR person, you already know the benefits, but you just need a push.  Do it.  Yes, they will just get cheaper and more capable, and then you will just find another reason to wait.<br />
Just one shot will have made it worth your while.  A shot of your daughter in low-light, where you were able to get a fast shutter because the camera automatically boosted the ISO to 800 to give you a 1/60s release &#8230; or an arty, large aperture/shallow depth of field shot that you&#8217;ll take in your garden &#8230; there just isn&#8217;t any comparison.<br />
I started with a D70 4 years ago, and just got a D300.  I can&#8217;t bear to put it down.<br />
The processing can be a bear, I admit, but it is better than sending the film off to get printed, or the mess and bother of your own darkroom, right?<br />
Buy the camera, get a decent zoom lens (18-70, or even 18-55) and maybe get a good 50mm prime.  In a few months buy an flash unit.  You won&#8217;t be sorry.  The great thing about DSLRs is that the bodies get cheaper but lenses continue to be useful with a new body.  So, in 3 years, you can buy a D500 and still use all your lenses and most of your accessories.  By then you&#8217;ll have an 8-year old that you won&#8217;t mind loaning your D40 to, justifying your D500 purchase.   ;^]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
